Ask a question in the Help Desk

Subscribe to the CL:AIRE general eAlert

Log in

Login to your account using your username or email

Log in

Remember Me

Forgot your password?
Forgot your username?

Register

Password Reset

Please enter the email address for your account. A verification code will be sent to you. Once you have received the verification code, you will be able to choose a new password for your account.

Submit

Reminder

Please enter the email address associated with your User account. Your username will be emailed to the email address on file.

Submit

Search

Your cart is empty

Frequently Asked Question - Why does the Code of Practice make no distinction between contaminated and uncontaminated material?

Why does the Code of Practice make no distinction between contaminated and uncontaminated material?

The need to distinguish between “contaminated” and “uncontaminated” soils is no longer considered necessary. These are self-defining terms on a site specific basis having regard to the risk assessment, e.g. some soil may not be considered contaminated for a given land use, but would be for a more sensitive land use, on the same site.

CL:AIRE will not be responsible for any loss, however arising, from the use of, or reliance on, the information contained in the responses above, nor do they assume responsibility or liability for errors or omissions in the information provided. Readers are advised to use the information contained herein purely as a guide and to take appropriate professional advice where necessary.